What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
Blog Article
Therefore, In the event the intent to cause injury is proven and it is actually further proven that while in the ordinary course of nature, that injury would result in death, that matter is currently objective and the intention to destroy (the main element that must
refers to law that will come from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common regulation,” and “case precedent,” supplies a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And exactly how These are applied in certain types of case.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of one day within the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained via the complainant. Moreover, there is no eye-witness in the alleged incidence and also the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners is tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred to become the real brothers in the deceased but they did not respond at all for the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, 1 after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of events that extra judicial confession of an accused is usually a weak style of evidence which can be manoeuvred with the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not come their way. The prosecution is usually relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word regarding presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners alongside one another on a motorcycle at four.
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed inside the bank and because only the appellants were posted in the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
“Guaranteeing the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple reputable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or even the finding and mould the relief to really make it proper for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified with the decision of the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are in the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They are really subject matter to rules and regulations Should the recruitment rules here of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded, however, we're distinct in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject to the approval of your competent authority. Read more
The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge towards the Judgment within time. Read more
Accessing free case law sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and everyone seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
When the petitioner is actually present on the place of occurrence without causing any injury to your deceased or PWs then in such circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided with the uncovered trial Court after recording from the evidence.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This article delves into the intricacies of the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to provide a comprehensive understanding of its implications and functional applications.
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and fork out fixation are not entertainable with the reasons that this sort of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and also the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient therefore this petition is dismissed, which entails disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court will not be within a position to dilate upon these disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he had suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.